Table of Contents
The DNA in eukaryotes is wrapped around a histone octamer core, together comprising the main subunit of chromatin, the nucleosome. Modifications of the nucleosomal histones in the genome correlate with the ability or inability of chromatin to form higher order structures, that in turn influence gene activity. The genome in primordial germ cells in early C. elegans germ cells carries a unique pattern of histone modifications that correlate with transcriptional repression in these cells, and aspects of this chromatin regulation are conserved in Drosophila. Loss of repression causes sterility in the adults, suggesting that chromatin-based repression is essential for germ line maintenance. The post-embryonic germ line also exhibits unique and dynamic aspects of chromatin regulation, with chromosome-wide regulation particularly evident on the X chromosome. Several properties of X-specific chromatin assembly are also sex-specific. These properties appear to be responding to the meiotic pairing status of the X chromosome, rather than the sex of the germ cells. Finally, gamete-specific chromatin regulation during gametogenesis impacts on X chromatin assembly in the offspring, leading to an apparent sperm-imprinted X inactivation in the early embryo. Other potential roles for germline-specific modes of chromatin assembly in genome regulation and protection are discussed.
The germ line in C. elegans, as in any organism, must be established in early embryogenesis and then maintained throughout development and in the adult gonad. Key processes for establishment and maintenance include activation and repression of the proper sets of genes, and the protection of genetic information from heritable mutation caused by mobile genetic elements. One can therefore consider these as two overlapping teleological goals for guardianship of the germ line: the maintenance of germ line character and the maintenance of genome integrity.
In this chapter we will discuss the different phases of transcriptional regulation that have been observed in the C. elegans germ line. Transcriptional regulation in embryonic germ cells is somewhat unique, because global "protective" repression of genes involved in somatic differentiation coexists with the activities of genes needed for germ cell survival. In C. elegans, part of this is achieved by a strong reliance on maternally provided proteins and transcripts' maternal supplies of essential factors can initially replace a requirement for zygotic transcriptional activity. A genome-wide transcriptional repression that is mediated by the maternal protein PIE-1 is thus made feasible in the early embryonic germ line by sufficient maternal support. Subsequent to PIE-1's degradation, another mode of embryonic transcriptional repression follows that involves regulated changes of chromatin structure. The post-embryonic germ line, unlike the primordial germ cells (PGCs) in the embryo, is both proliferative and highly transcriptionally engaged. Global repression is therefore not a viable strategy, and the processes are necessarily more refined. We will discuss the contributions of regulated chromatin assembly in maintaining and protecting the post-embryonic germ line.
C. elegans lacks cytosine methylation and thus relies mostly on modifications of histone proteins to dictate chromatin structure (Simpson et al., 1986 ). In eukaryotes, two each of the four core histone proteins, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, form an octamer, around which DNA is wrapped to form a nucleosome, the fundamental unit of chromatin. Varieties of a fourth histone protein, H1, associate with the "linker" DNA between each nucleosome. Each histone protein can be post-translationally modified in various ways, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, and ADP-ribosylation. The combination of these modifications on the various histone proteins correlates with different biological functions (Peterson and Laniel, 2004 ). For example, acetylation of lysine residues on histones H3 and H4 correlates with transcriptionally competent euchromatin (Grunstein, 1997 ). Methylation of lysines 4 and 36 on histone H3 (H3methK4, H3methK36) are also enriched in transcriptionally competent euchromatin, and these modifications are especially abundant during transcriptional initiation and elongation (Hampsey and Reinberg, 2003 ; Kouzarides, 2002 ). In budding yeast the methyltransferases responsible for these modifications, Set1 and Set2 respectively, are recruited to sites of transcriptional elongation by the different phospho-epitopes of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII; Krogan et al., 2003 ; Ng et al., 2003 ; see also Specification of the germ line). In contrast, methylation of lysines 9 and 27 on histone H3 (H3methK9, H3methK27) correspond to a transcriptionally repressed chromatin state (Lachner and Jenuwein, 2002 ; Muller et al., 2002 ). In general, while H3K9 hypermethylation is a conserved component of constitutive heterochromatin (e.g., pericentric chromatin in mammals), both H3K9 and H3K27 methylation can have variable representation in facultative heterochromatin (e.g., the inactivated X chromosome in female mammals) and in individually silenced loci (Sims et al., 2003 ).
Summary: Modifications of nucleosomal histones affect the function (e.g., transcriptional activity) of genomic regions. In general, histone acetylation reduces histone interactions with DNA, and hence can increase accessibility to transcription machinery. Histone methylation can correlate with silenced DNA (H3methK9, H3methK27), or with active DNA (H3methK4, H3methK36).
In early C. elegans embryos, the germ lineage (P lineage) is transcriptionally repressed by PIE-1, a CCCH zinc finger protein. PIE-1 is actively and asymmetrically segregated during early sequential cell divisions into the posterior blastomeres that comprise the germ (P) lineage (Mello et al., 1996 ; Seydoux et al., 1996 ; see Specification of the germ line). This transcriptional repression is necessary for germ cell identity, since the P2 blastomere and its daughters are transformed into somatic blastomeres by loss of PIE-1 activity (Mello et al., 1992 ; Seydoux et al., 1996 ). PIE-1 is present until the division of P4 into the primordial germ cells, Z2 and Z3, at approximately the 100-cell stage (Mello et al., 1996 ). In all stages leading up to this division, histone modifications corresponding to transcriptionally competent chromatin are found in germline blastomeres at levels similar to their somatic neighbors (Schaner et al., 2003 ; Figure 1A-D). This indicates that PIE-1 is not repressing transcription through a repressive chromatin architecture, and potentially supports the model proposed by Zhang, et al. that PIE-1 does not prevent binding of the transcription complex to promoters (Zhang et al., 2003 ). Also supporting this model is the observation that a phospho-epitope on the C-terminal domain repeat (CTD) sequence of RNAP II that corresponds to transcriptional initiation, phospho-Ser5, is present in all cells of the early embryo, whereas a phospho-epitope corresponding to transcriptional elongation, phospho-Ser2, is found only in the somatic blastomeres (Seydoux and Dunn, 1997 ). It therefore appears that chromatin in the early germ lineage is competent for transcriptional initiation, but PIE-1 represses transcription by preventing transcriptional elongation. The PIE-1 mode of germline repression seems limited to nematodes, since no obvious orthologs of PIE-1 have been identified in other organisms.
Summary: The early embryonic germline blastomeres that contribute to both germline and somatic lineages are globally quiescent for transcription. This quiescence requires portioning of the maternal factor PIE-1 into the germ line. The chromatin architecture in both somatic and germline cells, at these early stages, seems identical.
The division of P4 is the first symmetric division of the embryonic germ line, yielding the equipotent primordial germ cells, Z2/Z3 (PGCs). Their birth completes the separation of germ line and somatic lineages, and is accompanied by several dramatic changes in germline regulation, including the loss of PIE-1 and a specific change in chromatin structure.
Coincident with PIE-1 degradation, RNAPII phospho-Ser2 appears in Z2/Z3 (Seydoux and Dunn, 1997 ). Despite the appearance of this epitope, however, only a few mRNAs are known to be produced in these cells, and these are detected at a later time in development (e.g., pgl-1 and nos-2 mRNAs; Kawasaki et al., 1998 ; Subramaniam and Seydoux, 1999 ). These cells are mitotically quiescent until the embryo hatches, which may indicate continued transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional repression, but an extensive analysis of this has not been done.
The DNA in Z2/Z3 is also noticeably more condensed than in surrounding somatic nuclei (Schaner et al., 2003 ). In addition, there is a change in three specific histone modifications, as detected by specific antibodies (Table 1). Histone H3 di- and tri-methylated on lysine 4 and histone H4 acetylated on lysine 8 (H3methK4 and H4acetylK8, respectively) are all globally reduced in the chromatin of the PGCs upon their birth (Figure 1E, F). In contrast, trimethylation of H3 lysine 27 (H3trimeK27) remains relatively unchanged, and in fact may actually increase slightly (Bender et al., 2004 ; Schaner et al., 2003 ). The stabilization and/or slight increase in H3trimethK27 are thought to be due in part to conversion of H3dimethK27 to the tri-methylated form in Z2/Z3. Since H3methK4 and H4acetylK8 both correlate with transcriptional competence, and H3trimethK27 with transcriptional repression, this suggests that transcriptional repression remains engaged in these cells, but has switched to a chromatin-based mechanism. This may also indicate at least a partial switch from maternal control of germline repression to zygotic control, although the mechanisms are not well defined for the chromatin mode. It is intriguing to note that H3dimethK27 appears specifically in Z2/Z3 in the absence of maternal MES-2, which is a histone methyltransferase required for all other H3K27 methylation in the early embryo (Bender et al., 2004 ). This may further indicate a zygotic process engaging upon the birth of Z2/Z3 that involves activation of Z2/Z3-restricted histone methyltransferase(s).
Table 1. Histone modifications in the early germ line
|Histone modification||Correlation||P1 - P4||Z2/Z3 (embryo)||Z2/Z3 (hatch + feed)||Somatic blastomeres|
|H3diacetylK9/ K14||Active genes||Present||Present||Present||Present|
|H3methK4 (di/tri)||Active genes||Present||Absent||Present||Present|
The specific loss of the H3methK4 epitope is intriguing, since until recently there were no known histone demethylases and this mark was thought to be enzymatically irreversible. A recent report, however, has described histone demethylation activity in a human homolog of amine oxidases, of which C. elegans has several potential orthologs, which raises the possibility of PGC-specific histone demethylase activity (Shi, et al., 2004 ). However, the chromatin remodeling could also be due to PGC-specific replacement of histone H3 coupled with prevention of K4 methylation. In addition, since the observed change is most readily noticed as a loss of antibody binding, a cleavage of the H3 tail containing the epitope, or masking of the antibody epitope through additional modifications of nearby residues could explain the results. The mechanism that leads to the loss of H3methK4 in the PGCs remains to be elucidated.
Once it disappears, H3methK4 remains absent from PGCs until after hatching, and even then does not return if the embryos hatch into a foodless environment. Once food is available, however, H3methK4 can be observed to accumulate prior to the PGCs' post-embryonic proliferation (Schaner et al., 2003 ). The absence of H3methK4 from PGCs upon their specification appears to be a conserved mark of these important cells, and continued absence from PGC birth through hatching requires the Nanos orthologues NOS-1 and NOS-2. Both the absence of H3methK4 from PGCs and the requirement for NANOS for its maintenance are conserved in Drosophila. Loss of both nos gene products in worms, and the single NANOS in flies, results in premature return of H3methK4 and subsequent loss of the primordial germ cells in both organisms (Schaner et al., 2003 ).
A candidate for mediating the loss of H4acetylK8 (and perhaps indirectly H3methK4) is the worm counterpart of the nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase (NURD) complex. This complex consists of MEP-1, a Kräppel-type zinc-finger protein, LET-418, a homologue of the NURD complex component Mi-2, and the histone deacetylase HDA-1. Together they are involved in the repression of germ line-specific genes in the soma, presumably through their chromatin remodeling activity. (Unhavaithaya et al., 2002 ; see Specification of the germ line) MEP-1, HDA-1, and LET-418 have been shown to interact with PIE-1, suggesting that the NURD complex could be regulated in the embryonic germ line by PIE-1. Once PIE-1 is degraded at the 100-cell stage, the complex would then be free to remodel the chromatin in the PGCs. Indeed, loss of H4acetylK8 and H3methK4 from the PGCs is temporally linked to the loss of PIE-1. This scenario, however, lacks experimental support since depletion of mep-1 , let-418 , or hda-1 by RNAi had no appreciable effect on loss of H3methK4 or H4acetylK8 in PGCs (Schaner et al., 2003 ). mep-1 and let-418 mutants are viable but grow up as sterile adults, suggesting that the NURD complex does indeed play essential roles in the germ line, but perhaps at a later stage (Unhavaithaya et al., 2002 ).
Summary: The first symmetric division of the embryonic germ line yields the PGCs, Z2/Z3. Upon their birth, PIE-1 degrades and there is a change in chromatin architecture specific to the PGCs. This is similar to what is observed in Drosophila PGCs. In both organisms, NANOS activity is required to maintain this unique architecture, which correlates with transcriptional quiescence. The factors required to establish the PGC-specific chromatin in C. elegans are not known.
As detailed above, H3methK4 normally returns to Z2/Z3 prior to their proliferation, which happens after completion of embryogenesis and when the hatched larva has begun feeding. The return of this modification thus coincides with a presumed need to generally reactivate transcription in advance of germ cell proliferation (Schaner et al., 2003 ). From this point on the genome in post-embryonic germ cells is transcriptionally active, as indicated both by germ cell expansion, bulk maternal gene expression (in later stages), and high levels of histone modifications that correlate with active transcription. Two striking exceptions to this active status exist: the X chromosome and extrachromosomal transgene arrays.
The X chromosome in immature germ cells of both males and hermaphrodites lacks most histone modifications corresponding to transcriptionally competent and/or active chromatin including, H3methK4 (Figure 2A and B), H4acetyl-K5, -K8, -K12, and -K16, and H3phosphoS10 (Kelly et al., 2002 ; Reuben and Lin, 2002 ). Indeed, the Ser-2 phospho-epitope of elongating RNA POLII is also largely absent (Kelly et al., 2002 ; Fong et al., 2002 ). Both male and females gonads are gamete factories, with distal proliferative cells exiting mitosis and progressing into and through meiotic stages in the more proximal regions (see Germline proliferation and its control). The X chromosome(s) is uniquely and strikingly depleted of the above modifications in all stages from the proliferative zone through pachytene stage in both ovary and testis (compare Table 2 to Table 3). This pattern suggests that there is a wholesale inactivation of the X chromosome during germ cell maturation, and this is consistent with genome-wide microarray analyses showing germline genes to be significantly under-represented on the X chromosome. (Reinke et al., 2000 ; see Germline genomics). An interesting, yet unresolved question is whether the loss of germline genes from the X chromosome is an evolved consequence of its unique chromatin status, or whether the unique chromatin is a simple consequence of the loss of genes that would be active in this tissue.
Table 2. X chromosome histone modifications in the adult germ line
|Histone Modifications||Distal → transition||Pachytene||Diplotene||Diakinesis||1-cell embryo|
|H4acetylK8, K16||Absent||Absent||Present (low)||Present||Present|
|H3diacetylK9/ K14||Absent||Absent||Present (low)||Present||Present|
|H3trimethK27||Present (high)||Present (high)||Present||Present||Present|
|Histone Modifications||Distal → transition||Pachytene||1°/2°||Spermatids||1-cell embryo|
Table 3. Autosome histone modifications in the adult germ line
|Histone modifications||Distal → transition||Pachytene||Diplotene||Diakinesis||1-cell embryo|
|Histone modifications||Distal → transition||Pachytene||1°/2°||Spermatids||1-cell embryo|
|H4acetylK8, K16||Present||Present||Present (low)||Absent||Present|
|H3diacetylK9/ K14||Present||Present||Present (low)||Absent||Present|
The transcriptional repression of the X chromosome is accomplished, at least in part, by the MES proteins. MES-6 (the C. elegans homologue of Drosophila Extra Sex Combs), MES-2 (the C. elegans homologue of Drosophila Enhancer of Zeste), and MES-3 (a novel protein), act together in a complex that is maternally supplied and required for germ cell function (Xu et al., 2001 ). Enhancer of Zeste and Extra Sex Combs are members of the Polycomb group of transcriptional regulators, known for their role in promoting a repressed chromatin state. The proposed repressive activity of the MES complex has recently been strengthened by the demonstration of its function as a histone methyltransferase complex. The catalytic component MES-2 di- and tri-methylates lysine 27 of histone H3 (Bender et al., 2004 ). H3methK27, particularly its tri-methylated form (H3trimethK27), has been shown to correspond with transcriptional repression and H3trimethK27 is enriched on the X chromosome during pachytene. An additional MES protein, MES-4, is a SET-domain containing protein thought to exclude the repressive MES-2,-3,-6 complex from the autosomes. MES-4 is found on all chromosomes in adult germ cells except for the X, supporting its role as an antagonist of repressive chromatin structure (Fong et al., 2002 ).
The role of the MES proteins in X chromatin regulation likely contributes, at least in part, to the X dosage-dependent severity of phenotypes in mes mutants, with severity increasing with X dosage (Garvin et al., 1998 ). As mentioned above, other sex-specific aspects of X chromatin regulation also exist in later meiotic stages of male and female germ cells.
In hermaphrodites, “activating” histone modifications begin to accumulate on the X during diplotene, reaching the levels present on autosomes by diakinesis stage (Table 2A). This accumulation corresponds with the onset of X-linked oocyte-specific transcription that is not detected until late pachytene stage. These transcripts are observed to accumulate at high levels in maturing oocytes. The accumulation may represent mRNA synthesized in, and transported from, nuclei in earlier stages, since the phospho-Ser5 epitope of RNA POLII is not detectable on the chromatin in these cells (Kelly et al., 2002 ). After ovulation and fertilization, the oocyte chromosomes retain all of the histone modifications present in diakinesis, even after the MI and MII meiotic divisions. The oocyte genome therefore appears to arrive into the zygote in a chromatin state grossly similar to its status in oogenesis, and this does not appreciably change in early stages.
Despite the transcriptional repression of the X chromosome until late pachytene, it does not specifically accumulate global H3methK9 during oogenesis. Indeed, whereas there is a transient accumulation of H3methK9 on all autosomes as the germ cells exit pachytene stage of meiosis, the X chromosome seems to lack this addition (Table 2A; Kelly et al., 2002 ; Bean et al., 2004 ). The accumulation of H3methK9 on the autosomes coincides with the accumulation of activating modifications on the X chromosomes, so there is likely a regulatory connection. One should note that these data (as well as those discussed for males below) represent antibody staining with commercially available anti-H3dimethK9 antisera; no published studies using highly specific antibodies against the trimethylated form in worms are currently available.
The other “repressive” marks, H3di- and trimethK27, are both present on all chromosomes at all germ cell stages in the ovary, but there is an enrichment of H3trimethK27 on the X chromosomes in pachytene nuclei (Tables 2A and 3A). In mes-2 mutant ovaries, both forms of H3methK27 are absent from distal to medial stages, but both are present in more proximal stages (Bender et al., 2004 ). This presumably reflects the activity of another K27 methyltransferase that is only active in mid-pachytene and later stages of meiosis.
There are two types of sperm in C. elegans— those generated in hermaphrodite larvae, and those generated in males. We will primarily discuss male germ cells, but will mention differences observed in hermaphrodite spermatogenesis where they occur. There are very distinct modes of chromatin regulation that occur in the male germ line that are not normally observed in the female germ line. In the male testis, activating modifications (e.g., H3 and H4 acetylation, H3methK4) never accumulate on the X chromosome in germ cells at any stage (Table 2B). The failure of the male X to accumulate these modifications indicates transcriptional repression throughout gametogenesis, which is supported by the exceptional paucity reported for spermatogenesis genes on the X-chromosome (Reinke et al., 2000 ; see Germline genomics). Furthermore, all assayed modifications on the autosomes are observed to be shed as the germ cells exit diplotene during spermatogenesis (Table 2B; Kelly et al., 2002 ). This is presumably due to sperm histone replacement that occurs in many organisms, but has not as yet been described in C. elegans.
Other than the sperm-specific disappearance of H3di- and trimethK27 in diplotene nuclei (as is the case with all other assayed modifications), male and female germ cells appear to have similar regulation of these marks (Tables 2 and 3). This sharply contrasts with the H3methK9 pattern seen in male gametogenesis. The male X uniquely accumulates H3methK9 during pachytene (Figure 3D) and maintains this modification until it disappears at spermatogenesis. Interestingly, this enrichment on the X does not appear to happen in hermaphrodite spermatogenesis (Bean et al., 2004 ; Kelly et al., 2002 ). Why is the X chromosome targeted for H3methK9 enrichment only in male meiosis? One possibility is that this is a male-specific process; however, targeting of the X for H3methK9 enrichment can occur in sexually transformed XO hermaphrodites and is absent in transformed XX male spermatogenesis (Bean et al., 2004 ). Another possibility is that the targeting of the X is the result of its unpaired status during male meiosis. This seems to be the case, since targeting of both X's occurs in him-8 mutant hermaphrodites, in which X chromosome pairing is disrupted. In addition, transgene arrays and free autosomal duplications are also targeted for H3methK9 addition during meiosis in both sexes (Bean et al., 2004 ). These results indicate that this process is neither X chromosome-specific or sex-specific, but instead may generally act on DNA entering meiosis without a pairing partner.
Three proteins have been identified that play a role in the enrichment of H3methK9 on the male X during meiosis. One, HIM-17, is a chromatin-associated protein required for recombination, but not homolog alignment or synapsis, during meiosis (Reddy and Villeneuve, 2004). A second protein is RHA-1. RHA-1 is a putative RNA helicase that is required for proper chromatin assembly on the male X, transgene silencing, and RNAi in germ cells. Curiously, the chromatin and silencing defects are only observed at the elevated temperatures, and the animals are sterile. In contrast, the animals are fertile, yet still defective in RNAi, at lower temperatures (Walstrom et al., 2005). Interestingly, the germline-specific RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) EGO-1 is required for both RNAi and H3methK9 enrichment on unpaired DNA (Maine et al., 2005). In the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa, repression of unpaired DNA ("meiotic silencing") also requires an RdRP, which suggests that the process is conserved (discussed below).
Summary: The post-embryonic germline is transcriptionally engaged and proliferative. Instead of a global genomic repression, as seen in the embryo, there are post-embryonic mechanisms that target repression of the X chromosome, and these can involve assembly of repressive chromatin. Transgene and X chromosome repression are mediated, in part, by the mes Polycomb Group proteins. Unpaired chromosomes going through meioisis in either sex can be targeted for repressive chromatin assembly. Male specific targeting of the X chromosome for repressive chromatin assembly appears to be an evolved consequence of the unpaired status of the X in males.
The meiotic divisions in the oocyte occur after fertilization, and thus the 1-cell embryo is essentially still very much a germ cell in character with two separate genomes. As discussed above, each genome arrives with quite distinct histories of chromatin regulation: the oocyte genome is enriched in histones that carry activating modifications, whereas the sperm lacks any such marks, and indeed may be depleted of histones. Prior to genome fusion, the sperm pronuclear chromosomes accumulate histone modifications and begin to decondense— with a specific exception that is discussed below. After the meiotic divisions are complete, the maternal and paternal haploid genomes fuse to form the diploid zygote.
Before and after fertilization, all chromosomes in the oocyte pronucleus contain H3methK4 and other epitopes consistent with transcriptional competence (Figure 3A and data not shown). The sperm arrives devoid of all assayed modifications (Figure 3B), but quickly accumulates them on its autosomes as the chromosomes in the male pronucleus begin to decondense (Figure 3C). The sperm X (Xp), however, initially appears uniquely refractory to accumulating H3methK4 (Figure 3C and D), and remains significantly and heritably devoid of this and other H3-specific modifications for several rounds of cell division (Table 2B; Bean et al., 2004 ). These modifications initially gradually appear with increased embryonic cell number, until the Xp is indistinguishable from other chromosomes in 20-24-cell embryos. This delayed appearance is consistent with dilution of a persistently unmodified histone H3, or H3-like molecule, during DNA replication. In addition, the timing of the appearance of H3methK4 on the Xp is influenced by whether it had a pairing partner during meiosis. The apparent zygotic activation of an Xp from an XO parent is significantly delayed relative to activation of an Xp from an XX parent (Bean et al., 2004 ). It is important to emphasize, however, that imprint establishment occurs in sperm from both XO and XX animals— meiotic pairing in the parental germ line only influences the stability of the imprint in the offspring.
The rate of disappearance of the imprint could theoretically be determined by its rate of replacement by S-phase histone H3, which is a suitable substrate for lysine 4 methylation. A higher level of the imprint on an Xp could thus take longer (i.e., more cell divisions) to be replaced in the embryo. One obvious difference between these Xp's is that the Xp from an XO parent is transiently marked with H3methK9 during pachytene stage, while the Xp from an XX parent is not, as discussed above. The transient H3methK9 mark could direct the incorporation of increased levels of an unidentified “imprint” an Xp from an XO parent during spermatogenesis. This higher level may subsequently take more rounds of replication in the embryo for effective S-phase coupled histone replacement of the imprint, which would be observed as an increased perdurance of the mark.
Summary: Passage of an X chromosome through spermatogenesis establishes an epigenetic, metastable imprint on the X chromosome that results in its temporary inactivation in XX offspring. The duration of the inactivation is influenced by whether the X chromosome had a pairing partner in sperm meiosis. The nature of the imprint, at this time, is unclear.
In many ways, the silencing of repetitive transgene arrays mimics at least a subset of the repressive mechanisms regulating X chromatin assembly. Repetitive transgene arrays are silenced in all post-embryonic germ cells, including larval stages (Kelly et al., 1997 ; Figure 4C). In adults, the stage at which most analyses have been done, this silencing correlates with an enrichment of H3methK9 in the array chromatin (Figure 4F), as well as an absence of H3methK4 (Figure 4D) and other “active chromatin” marks (Kelly et al., 2002 ; Reuben and Lin, 2002 ). Silencing of these arrays is dependent on the DNA content, as less repetitive (more “complex”) arrays are not silenced (Figure 4B) and consequently contain H3methK4 and can lack H3methK9 (Kelly et al., 2002 and W. Kelly, unpublished). The C. elegans MES/ Polycomb Group proteins (discussed above) are required for efficient silencing of repetitive transgene arrays, as are HPL-2 (a highly conserved heterochromatin binding protein) and H1.1 (an H1 histone isoform). These findings strongly implicate a predominant role for chromatin structure in this silencing process (Couteau et al., 2002 ; Jedrusik and Schulze, 2001 ). Interestingly, a subset of mutants defective in RNAi also exhibit defective transgene silencing in germ cells, illustrating a potential contribution of dsRNAs toward post-transcriptional and/or transcriptional repression, as discussed below (Ketting et al., 1999 ; Tabara et al., 1999 ). A genome-wide screen for genes required for RNA-mediated silencing also identified 14 genes whose functions are also required for germline silencing, further strengthening a role for RNAi in this process (Kim et al., 2005).
Summary: Multi-copy transgenes are strongly silenced in the post-embryonic germ line and mimic, in many respects, the regulation of the X chromosome. Mutants that cause defects in X-specific chromatin assembly, or are required for assembly of repressive chromatin, also have defects in silencing multi-copy transgenes in the germ line.
Why are extrachromosomal arrays and other unpaired DNA species preferentially targeted for H3methK9 addition during meiosis, and more specifically, during early pachytene stage? Meiotic pairing of homologous chromosomes is effectively complete upon entry into pachytene. Meiotic pairing not only allows for genetic recombination, but also affords a chance for the linear sequences of entire homologous chromosomes to be compared. Mobile genetic elements by their nature are mutagenic; the germ line is the one tissue where mutations are heritable and thus is a major site of the battles waged between these elements and host genomes. Significant deviations in linear sequence, such as those imposed by transposable element insertions, could perhaps be “noticed” at this point as looped out, or unpaired DNA, and targeted for repression to prevent further spreading. As mentioned above, similar phenomenon, meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA (MSUD, or simply meiotic silencing), has been identified in Neurospora (Shiu et al., 2001 ), and surprisingly, it requires conserved components of the RNA interference pathway (Hynes and Todd, 2003 ). This suggests a role for RNAi in MSUD, in addition to its potential roles in other modes of genome surveillance.
Transposons are major targets of silencing mechanisms in most, if not all, organisms, and are specifically repressed in the C. elegans germ line by the RNAi machinery (Sijen and Plasterk, 2003). In fact, many of the mutator (mut) genes involved in germline silencing of transposable elements are also required for RNAi and vice versa (Ketting et al., 1999 ; Tabara et al., 1999 ). Moreover, defective transgene silencing in germ cells is observed in mutants defective in both RNAi and transposon repression, indicating that all three processes are mechanistically related. Though RNAi has been mostly appreciated for its role in post-transcriptional gene silencing, it is now recognized as serving highly conserved and ancient roles in transcriptional regulation (Lippman and Martienssen, 2004 ). A major and conserved component of the transcriptional arm of RNAi is its role in targeting of H3methK9 to genomic sequences (Volpe et al., 2002 ). It is thus not complete speculation to hypothesize that pairing-sensing mechanisms operating during worm meiosis may somehow utilize components of the RNAi machinery to direct assembly of heterochromatin to unpaired DNA. The natural targets of these processes are likely to be novel transposition events— the male X may be a happenstance target by virtue of its (evolved) unpaired status during male meiosis. The role of RNAi in these processes awaits further investigation.
Summary: Some mutants that are defective in RNAi also exhibit defects in germline transposon and transgene repression. RNAi has been shown in other organisms to direct repressive chromatin assembly. This may suggest that germline transgene silencing may, in part, be revealing genome defense mechanisms that act through RNAi to target multi-copy genetic elements for repressive chromatin assembly.
Histone modifications, like histones themselves, are exquisitely conserved among eukaryotes and represent a very ancient form of basal genetic regulation. This conservation largely extends to the function of each individual modification, and therefore the rules of the game as they are understood in any organisms are likely to apply to others. The game in question, “epigenetics” (defined as heritable changes in gene expression in the absence of changes in genomic sequence), is a rapidly growing field with tremendous biomedical implications. The genetics, cytology, and molecular biology of C. elegans are likely to continue to contribute in a major way to our understanding of the rules, and perhaps how we can bend them in our favor.
Couteau, F., Guerry, F., Muller, F., and Palladino, F. (2002). A heterochromatin protein 1 homologue in Caenorhabditis elegans acts in germline and vulval development. EMBO Rep. 3, 235–241. Abstract Article
Emmons, S.W., Yesner, L., Ruan, K.S., and Katzenberg, D. (1983). Evidence for a transposon in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell 32, 55–65. Article
Fong, Y., Bender, L., Wang, W., and Strome, S. (2002). Regulation of the different chromatin states of autosomes and X chromosomes in the germ line of C. elegans. Science 296, 2235–2238. Abstract Article
Garvin, C., Holdeman, R., and Strome, S. (1998). The phenotype of mes-2, mes-3, mes-4 and mes-6, maternal-effect genes required for survival of the germline in Caenorhabditis elegans, is sensitive to chromosome dosage. Genetics 148, 167–185. Abstract
Jedrusik, M.A., and Schulze, E. (2001). A single histone H1 isoform (H1.1) is essential for chromatin silencing and germline development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 128, 1069–1080. Abstract
Kawasaki, I., Shim, Y.H., Kirchner, J., Kaminker, J., Wood, W.B., and Strome, S. (1998). PGL-1, a predicted RNA-binding component of germ granules, is essential for fertility in C. elegans. Cell 94, 635–645. Abstract Article
Kelly, W.G., Schaner, C.E., Dernburg, A.F., Lee, M.H., Kim, S.K., Villeneuve, A.M., and Reinke, V. (2002). X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 129, 479–492. Abstract
Kelly, W.G., Xu, S., Montgomery, M.K., and Fire, A. (1997). Distinct requirements for somatic and germline expression of a generally expressed Caernorhabditis elegans gene. Genetics 146, 227–238. Abstract
Ketting, R.F., Haverkamp, T.H., van Luenen, H.G., and Plasterk, R.H. (1999). Mut-7 of C. elegans, required for transposon silencing and RNA interference, is a homolog of Werner syndrome helicase and RNaseD. Cell 99, 133–141. Abstract Article
Kim, J.K., Gabel, H.W., Kamath, R.S., Tewari, M., Pasquinelli, A., Rual, J.F., Kennedy, S., Dybbs, M., Bertin, N., Kaplan, J.M., Vidal, M., and Ruvkun, G. (2005). Functional genomic analysis of RNA interference in C. elegans. Science 308, 1164–1167. Abstract Article
Krogan, N.J., Kim, M., Tong, A., Golshani, A., Cagney, G., Canadien, V., Richards, D.P., Beattie, B.K., Emili, A., Boone, C., et al. (2003). Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 4207–4218. Abstract Article
Maine, E.M., Hauth, J., Ratliff, T., Vought, V.E., She, X., and Kelly, W.G. (2005). EGO-1, a putative RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, is required for heterochromatin assembly on unpaired dna during C. elegans meiosis. Curr. Biol. 15, 1972–1978. Abstract Article
Mello, C.C., Draper, B.W., Krause, M., Weintraub, H., and Priess, J.R. (1992). The pie-1 and mex-1 genes and maternal control of blastomere identity in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 70, 163–176. Abstract Article
Muller, J., Hart, C.M., Francis, N.J., Vargas, M.L., Sengupta, A., Wild, B., Miller, E.L., O'Connor, M.B., Kingston, R.E., and Simon, J.A. (2002). Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 111, 197–208. Abstract Article
Ng, H.H., Robert, F., Young, R.A., and Struhl, K. (2003). Targeted recruitment of Set1 histone methylase by elongating Pol II provides a localized mark and memory of recent transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell 11, 709–719. Abstract Article
Reinke, V. Smith, H.E., Nance, J., Wang, J., Van Doren, C., Begley, R., Jones, S.J.M., Davis, E.B., Scherer, S., Ward, S., and Kim, S.K. (2000). A global expression profile of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 6, 605–616. Abstract Article
Schaner, C.E., Deshpande, G., Schedl, P.D., and Kelly, W.G. (2003). A conserved chromatin architecture marks and maintains the restricted germ cell lineage in worms and flies. Dev. Cell 5, 747–757. Abstract Article
Seydoux, G., and Dunn, M.A. (1997). Transcriptionally repressed germ cells lack a subpopulation of phosphorylated RNA polymerase II in early embryos of Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Development 124, 2191–2201. Abstract
Shi, Y., Lan, F., Matson, C., Mulligan, P., Whetstine, J.R., Cole, P.A., Casero, R.A., and Shi, Y. (2004). Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119, 941–953. Abstract Article
Simpson, V.J., Johnson, T.E., and Hammen, R.F. (1986). Caenorhabditis elegans DNA does not contain 5-methylcytosine at any time during development. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 6711–6719. Abstract
Subramaniam, K., and Seydoux, G. (1999). nos-1 and nos-2, two genes related to Drosophila nanos, regulate primordial germ cell development and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 126, 4861–4871. Abstract
Tabara, H., Sarkissian, M., Kelly, W.G., Fleenor, J., Grishok, A., Timmons, L., Fire, A., and Mello, C.C. (1999). The rde-1 gene, RNA interference, and transposon silencing in C. elegans. Cell 99, 123–132. Abstract Article
Unhavaithaya, Y., Shin, T.H., Miliaras, N., Lee, J., Oyama, T., and Mello, C.C. (2002). MEP-1 and a homolog of the NURD complex component Mi-2 act together to maintain germline-soma distinctions in C. elegans. Cell 111, 991–1002. Abstract Article
Volpe, T.A., Kidner, C., Hall, I.M., Teng, G., Grewal, S.I., and Martienssen, R.A. (2002). Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science 297, 1833–1837. Abstract Article
Walstrom, K.M., Schmidt, D., Bean, C.J., and Kelly, W.G. (2005). RNA helicase A is important for germline transcriptional control, proliferation, and meiosis in C. elegans. Mech. Dev. 122, 707–720. Abstract Article
Xu, L., Fong, Y., and Strome, S. (2001). The Caenorhabditis elegans maternal-effect sterile proteins, MES-2, MES-3, and MES-6, are associated in a complex in embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5061–5066. Abstract Article
*Edited by Judith Kimble and Susan Strome. Last revised March 25, 2009. Published January 24, 2006. This chapter should be cited as: Schaner, C. E. and Kelly, W. G. Germline chromatin (January 24, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.73.1, http://www.wormbook.org.
Copyright: © 2006 Christine E. Schaner and William G. Kelly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.